Talk:Johann Reinhold Forster

Johann Reinhold Forster is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by —Kusma (talk) at 15:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: German naturalist (1729–1798)

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 22, 2019.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Johann Reinhold Forster is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

According to the Colombia Encyclopedia ( http://www.bartleby.com/65/fo/ForsterJR.html ) and the Britannica ( http://www.britannica.com/eb/idx?idxid=214014&alphakey=f&seq=117144 ) he was German. Not Polish, not Greek, not Chinese. Burschenschafter

The articles you quote are stubs, if that. They don't mention the place where he was born which you constantly try to "germanize". We go into a lot of details. Instead of "Ger. Expl." we explain : "Polish born of German descent". He was born (and his whole family) in POLAND, not Greece, China nor Germany. Especially, not Germany!Space Cadet 19:48, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

SC, Oh what nonsense !!! Again incorrect and unreliable wikipedia entries

Moving facts here, because of repeated reverts and insertion of false info on article.

Johann Reinhold Forster (October 22, 1729 - December 9, 1798) was a German naturalist.

Forster made contributions to the early ornithology of Europe and North America. He is best known as the naturalist on James Cook's second Pacific voyage, when he was accompanied by his son Georg Forster.

Forster was born in Dirschau in Prussia at the time of the Prince Elector Kurfürst Friedrich August II. Wettin. Dirschau, now known as Tczew/Poland), is located twenty miles south of Danzig/Gdansk. Forster studied theology at the University of Halle, Germany, afterwards serving as a Lutheran pastor....

Space Cadet, I see that you have not stopped sabotaging wikipedia articles. Is it, that the chauvanist extrem nationalist and communist upbringing in Poland is so ingrained in you bunch of wikipedians, that you just have to distort everything, because you see it through red- not pink- glasses, just like comrad # 1 before you? Anyone with historical knowledge can see right through this b.s., however many of the gullible en-wikipedia readers might even believe some of it. No wonder you are having so much fun inputting incorrect and unreliable wikipedia entries.

Dear anon. You resort to calling me names and suggesting that I'm a brainwashed commie, with no mind of my own, yet you don't say one word in defense of your preposterous "XIX century Prussian historiography(?)" edits. Good going! Yours truly, Space Cadet 17:54, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Official Records of inhabitants of Dirschau, Westprussia since 1600's [1]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheran pastor ??

Although many encyclopedic sources cited here assign J.R. Forster to the Lutheran denomination, probably more or less automatically because he was a subject of the later very Lutheran kingdom of Prussia, he was in fact a pastor of the "Reformed Protestant" (i.e. Calvinist) church in Dierschau (which had no Lutheran church); this also fits his Scottisch family origins. See also the "Talk" for the Wikipedia entry on his son George. I have replaced the first footnote by a reference to his 1878 biography (in German) in "Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie", where this is clearly stated. --83.76.130.1 (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He was German and born in Germany

This Article has some serious mistakes. The place where he was born was in this time NOT Poland, it was Germany (State of Prussia)! It was only after 1945 occupied, so many hundred Years later. And he was of cause German. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.246.135 (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before the First Partition of Poland, the place was in Poland... —Kusma (t·c) 16:02, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

The Forsters in the South Sea

... that Johann Reinhold Forster, who together with his son George (both pictured) took part in the second voyage of James Cook, was described as "one of the Admiralty's vast mistakes"? Source: Beaglehole, John C. (1969) [1961]. The Journals of Captain James Cook on his Voyages of Discovery. Vol. II. Cambridge: Published for the Hakluyt Society at the University Press. p. xliii
- ALT1: ... that Johann Reinhold Forster was the parson of a small parish south of Danzig before becoming the naturalist on the second voyage of James Cook? Source: See for example s:de:ADB:Forster, Reinhold or various places in Hoare's book
- ALT2: ... that Johann Reinhold Forster was a Reformed pastor, a teacher at Warrington Academy, the naturalist on the second voyage of James Cook and a professor at the University of Halle? Source: See for example s:de:ADB:Forster, Reinhold or various places in Hoare's book
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Randy Huntington

5x expanded by Kusma (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 58 past nominations.

—Kusma (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I don't have access to the source, but I'm most interested in ALT0. Could you get a short passage from the book to help verify? It's not clear what was the mistake here, was it Forster's participation in the voyage, or the voyage itself? That January 11 expansion was one hell of an edit. The article is otherwise new enough. Earwig shows 51% for copyvio, but this appears to be excerpts from Forster's journal which is unambiguously public domain by now. I'll complete the rest of the review once you address the hook issue. Departure– (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Departure–, thank you for the review! Embarrassingly I actually misquoted this, fixed now. A more extensive quote is "But who is going to envy John Reinhold Forster? We have come to one of the awkward beings of the age, the patently conspicuous phenomenon of the voyage. Let us admit at once, where we can, the virtues of Forster, his learning, the width of his interests, his perceptiveness in some things, the fact that, sunk deep beneath the surface, there was said to be some geniality. Let us admit that the surface itself must have been, at first sight, sometimes impressive—or how else could he have taken in, temporarily, so many excellent persons? Let us concede, as a mitigating factor, that for ocean voyaging no man was ever by physical or mental constitution less fitted. Yet there is nothing that can make him other than one of the Admiralty's vast mistakes. From first to last on the voyage, and afterwards, he was an incubus." The "mistake" here in Beaglehole's eye is to hire Forster as the expedition's scientist. —Kusma (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Earwig 51% are with respect to this and just come from the fact that I and the author of that page both quote similar things from the same sources. —Kusma (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johann Reinhold Forster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kusma (talk · contribs) 15:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 09:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing this article and will have comments here soon. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 09:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	On an excursion, Forster found a lake that was later named "Lake Forster - could be more detailed... I assume this was in Fiordland, because that is where Tamatea / Dusky Sound is. Maybe gloss Honoris causa if it means something like an "honorary degree" in common English.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	withdrawn himself from the voyage.". - remove period Queen Charlotte Sound → Queen Charlotte Sound / Tōtaranui - common name Dusky Sound → Tamatea / Dusky Sound - common name honor → honour - I prefer American English, though this article appears to be written mostly in British English and this spelling should be changed for consistency. "Plymouth" could be linked "Halle (Saale)" could also be linked University of Halle is linked numerous times and HMS Resolution is linked twice in the same section - dup wlinks
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Ref layout is satisfactory.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I have no issues with the reliabilty of the sources and there also appears to be no uncited paragraphs, so a thumbs up from me.
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Spotcheck done by Earwig's detector is OK, only some common words or quotes got picked up... I will begin the manual spot check soon.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Perhaps mention the memorial of him in the article.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	This article is a good overview of his life and doesn't go off-topic. Passed.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issues of neutrality. Passed.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is stable and free of edit wars. Passed.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Source URL of lede image is dead. Y Image of gymnasium is licensed properly. Y Image of church is licensed properly. Y Image of church is river properly. Y Image of Lake Elton is licensed properly. Y Source URL of Warrington image is dead. 🚨 Image of Joseph Banks is licensed properly. Y Source URL for Thomas Pennant image is dead. 🚨 Image by John Francis Rigaud is licensed properly. Y Image by engraving is licensed properly. Y Image of Forster's tomb is licensed properly. Y
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Media is relevant. Pasesd.
	7. Overall assessment.

Thank you for reviewing! I have updated the image URL for Pennant and removed the Warrington image as I can't verify it. I might add another one from [2] at some later time. Will get to the rest soonish. —Kusma (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... I also think that's most of the general comments from me. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 23:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1a done a part but did not expand the Lake Forster episode; I think more detail would need to be spread more evenly over the voyage.
1b all done I think.
3a memorial plaque is now in the prose as well.
6a added archive URL for lede image.

@Alexeyevitch, thank you again! Is there anything else you would like for GA status or do you have any recommendations how to improve the article further? —Kusma (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a great article of his life, as is; it's comprehensive, cites reliable sources, has media. There is a few things left to check and once done I'll be happy promote it to GA. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 21:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. If you have any additional ideas what to improve, please let me know. I am planning to go for FA status later; currently I think the sections needing most work to become comprehensive are those on taxa named by/after him, works and legacy/reception/honours. —Kusma (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what should and shouldn't get expanded, though any improvements to the article will help it towards that goal. I haven't worked on any FAs yet but I'm aware image licensing and organization may be good to verify or check beforehand. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 20:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]